Hi Jorge, On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:44 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com> wrote: > > Dear authors, > > I couldn’t make it to the BESS meeting, so my apologies if some of these > things have been discussed. > > Some comments/questions:
Thanks for sending comments. > - In the last IETF, I suggested the use of BGP and the BGP-BFD attribute to > exchange discriminators, as in section 3.1.6 of > draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. The idea seemed to be accepted, but it is > not in the new version. This would allow the signaling of the discriminators > along with MAC/IP routes, IMET routes, AD per-EVI routes, IP-Prefix routes, > etc. without the burden of having to support the EVPN LSP-ping draft. There is a draft version -02 in the works intended to include distribution of BFD discriminators in BGP but this revision was not completed to the agreement of the authors in time to posted before this meeting. > - The draft describes an encapsulation and an alternative encapsulation. Is > the intend to keep both? Wouldn't be better to leave only one to ease > implementations and interoperability? Currently, the candidate version -02 draft dispenses with with the alternative encapsulation. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e...@gmail.com > Thank you. > Jorge _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
