Dear Donald, thank you for your attention to my Gen-Art comments. On Tue, May 20, 2025, 10:47 AM Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Vijay, > > Thanks for your review. See below. > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:21 AM Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd > > Title: EVPN Network Layer Fault Management > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-10 > > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > > Review Date: 2025-05-20 > > IETF LC End Date: Not known > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: This I-D is ready to be published as a standards document. > > > > Major issues: 0 > > > > Minor issues: 0 > > > > Nits: 3 > > > > Nits: > > 1. Section 1: s/that is to say between/that is, between/ > > OK > > > 2. Section 3: "Continuity testing at each layer SHOULD, if possible,..." > Here, > > isn't the "if possible" redundant? After all, then normative strength is > > SHOULD which loosely implies "if possible". > > OK > > > 3. Section 7: "...could affect the > > packet load on the network..." Would it be possible to expand on how > could the > > document affect the packet load on the network? For instance, is the > network > > affected because the packet size becomes large, and therefore requires > more > > processing at the endpoints and intermediaries? Or is the network load > > affected due the expected large number of EVIs once this standard is > > implemented? Or are there other reasons inherent in the implementation > of the > > document that would increase the network load? > > Sure, we can add a few words saying that the increase in load is > primarily due to the increase in the number of packets due to bfd > packets. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
