On Jul 24, 2007, at 18:57, Andrew Dawes wrote: > Jung-Tsung, > > I too am currently writing an article with revtex4 and I noticed the > same thing. Unfortunately this is a shortcoming of the bibtex style > file that ships with revtex4. The two solutions Adam listed are both > good options. Unfortunately I don't think that modifying the bibtex > style file will keep your journal article as a valid compuscript for > submission to a Phys. Rev. journal.
I'm confused. I thought the problem was that it's not valid if the URL field is included? > If this is for personal use or another publication this may not be a > concern but before you tinker with the bibtex style file it is > something to consider. In this case you generally want to rename it to revtexfixed.bst or something, and use that. > I hope revtex4 gets corrected, because that really is "the right > thing" to do... it shouldn't put URL's in article citations, it > should only include them for citations of online sources. I downloaded the package, and it should be straightforward to remove the URL field. Just remove the line format.url output in all entry types that shouldn't have it, and you should be all set, without munging your bibtex file. If this is going elsewhere for typesetting and you're forced to use the original .bst, you could also export your file as "Minimal BibTeX." IIRC that won't have any custom fields. For extra fun, drop your .aux file on BibDesk's main window to select only the entries that are cited in the paper. -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
