On 9/12/07, Adam R. Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is correct. It should also be possible to keep the old system around, > although I'm not sure how we'll manage autofile in that case. The only > reason I can see for doing this is cross-platform compatibility; if you find > using vi or (shudder) emacs easier than BibDesk on Mac OS, we're doing > something wrong :).
Oh goodness no! The only time I've ever not used BibDesk on Mac OS X was when I used TextMate to search-and-replace my local-urls to be correct relative paths. I'm mostly concerned about being able to pass on my bibfile and papers folder to my research group after I graduate. I'd like to leave something in an at least partially-usable form for my successors. > Incidentally, scripting would give you access to paths in the new system, so > conceivably you could use a script hook to copy them to Local-Url when > saving. No idea how practical that is. I'll do it if I have to, but compared to the current system which works exactly how I want it to it would be quite inconvenient :-) -R ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
