On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli <d...@jonasschnelli.ch> wrote:
> I agree that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions). The > proposed URI scheme would be completely different. This reminds me https://xkcd.com/927/ I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its integration and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the primary source of workflow management) goes directly against your proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK for me. slush
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
