On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi > > > I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its > > integration and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such > > rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the > > primary source of workflow management) goes directly against your > > proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK > > for me. > > The current question – as already mentioned – is we ACK to work together > on a signing protocol or if we NACK this before we even have started. > ACK for Ledger. What's necessary to sign a transaction is well known, I don't see how driving any hardware wallet from the wallet itself or from a third party daemon implementing that URL scheme would make any difference, other than providing better devices interoperability, as well as easier maintenance and update paths for the wallets. -- Nicolas Bacca | CTO, Ledger
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
