On June 27, 2022 8:03:38 AM EDT, Greg Sanders <gsander...@gmail.com> wrote: >One key difference seems to be that properly punishing someone based on >mempool behavior seems much more difficult. As we all know there is no "the >mempool". No, that's not relevant here: the DoS condition is the existence of a (mined) double spend for a given txout used in a coin join. That condition is entirely under the control of the wallet, and can be totally avoided by the wallet regardless of mempool behavior. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pl... linuxfoundation.cndm1--- via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pl... Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playing wi... Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playin... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pl... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pl... Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoi... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bi... Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playing with fu... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playing wi... Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playin... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pl... Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev