On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 04:47:33PM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi AJ, > > I like the idea and agree with everything you shared in the email except one > thing: > > > So I'm switching inquisition over to having a dedicated "IANA"-ish > > thing that's independent of BIP process nonsense. It's at: > > > > * https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/binana > > I think "authority" is a strong word especially in bitcoin and this process > could even work with BINN (Bitcoin Inquisition Numbers And Names). IANA (a > function of ICANN) is different thing altogether which was founded by US > government.
Bitcoin Inquisition is based on signet, which is a centralized blockchain for testing run by a central authority whose consensus is based on signatures from that authority. Using the term "authority" in this context is fine. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
