Hello, First off, apologies about my lack of participation. I am working on mostly unrelated things and I'm afraid I have failed the community in terms of what I can do on my end to keep the BIP process functional.
As such I am hereby resigning as BIP editor effective immediately. Please remove my access privileges to the repository when possible. -Kalle. On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 09:46, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:41:14AM -1000, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > Question: is there a recommended way to produce a shorter identifier for > > inline use in reading material? For example, for proposal > > BIN-2024-0001-000, I'm thinking: > > > > - BIN24-1 (references whatever the current version of the proposal is) > > - BIN24-1.0 (references revision 0) > > > > I think that doesn't look too bad even if there are over 100 proposals a > > year, with some of them getting into over a hundred revisions: > > > > - BIN24-123 > > - BIN24-123.123 > > Having lived through y2k, two-digit years give me the ick, but otherwise > sure. > > Cheers, > aj, that's how the kids who didn't live through y2k say it, right? > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
