bitcoin-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 4rd Meeting, Tuesday 21 Feb. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 4rd Meeting, Tuesday 21 Feb. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Yuval Kogman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Nadav Ivgi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Yuval Kogman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Rijndael via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Casey Rodarmor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Costless bribes against time-sensitive protocols Gleb Naumenko via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Rijndael via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Claus Ehrenberg via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits rot13maxi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Greg Tonoski via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Nagaev Boris via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Brad Morrison via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Brad Morrison via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Melvin Carvalho via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Claus Ehrenberg via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A Universal Coin Swap system based on bitcoin and a Bitcoin NFT system Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Universal Coin Swap system based on bitcoin and a Bitcoin NFT system Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys darosior via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Serverless Payjoin Dan Gould via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Serverless Payjoin alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Fabian via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning niftynei via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Vincenzo Palazzo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Using OP_VAULT to improve DLCs Ben Carman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using OP_VAULT to improve DLCs Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH_GROUP vs Ephemeral anchors Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH_GROUP vs Ephemeral anchors Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal rot13maxi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 3rd Meeting, Tuesday 17 Jan. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 3rd Meeting, Tuesday 17 Jan. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A Bitcoin NFT System Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Bitcoin NFT System Vincenzo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Bitcoin NFT System Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Alfie John via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Eric via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission John Tromp via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] onion addresses to try [At least 17% of Bitcoin Core 24.x listening nodes are running full-rbf] Vasil Dimov via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] onion addresses to try [At least 17% of Bitcoin Core 24.x listening nodes are running full-rbf] Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Roles and procedures around adding a bitcoin core maintainer alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Roles and procedures around adding a bitcoin core maintainer Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Roles and procedures around adding a bitcoin core maintainer alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Use of OP_CTV in p2p exchanges that use 2of3 multisig alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 24.0.1 Released Michael Ford via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 24.0.1 Released Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 24.0.1 Released Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-inquistion 23.0: evaluating soft forks on signet Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Yuval Kogman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case John Carvalho via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev

• Earlier messages
• Later messages