I did consider that. It might be a viable option. I'm dealing with people that are very uncomfortable with trying new things, and are likely to be critical of sound quality. Personally, I can tell the difference between ulaw and g729 in a heartbeat, but maybe others won't. I suppose I could provision the primary phones with ulaw and compress everybody else.
Have you put people on g729 in large numbers (office people?), and have they noticed? -Tim On Thursday 02 August 2007 16:41, Alex Robar wrote: > Hi Tim, > > It's not exactly what you asked, but have you thought about going with a > lower bandwidth codec? A lot of providers will give you the ability to use > g729, and at $10/channel, it's not prohibitively expensive. Even with > overhead, that 800kbps upstream could handle 20 channels and still leave > room for standard internet activities. > > AR > > On 8/2/07, Tim St. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know of an internet service provider that services the > > Brampton > > area that could provide something a little faster than the conventional > > ADSL > > speeds? DSL connections only offer 800 kbps upstream, which limits me to > > 6-7 > > channels. I have a potential customer who wants to do a short term > > office, > > and we would need (ideally) 1.5 Mb upstream, and a few Megs > > downstream. Any > > suggestions? > > > > Thanks > > > > -Tim > > -- > > Tim St. Pierre > > > > IP telephony specialist > > sip://[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Toronto: 647 722 6930 > > Toll-Free 1 888 488 6940 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tim St. Pierre IP telephony specialist sip://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Toronto: 647 722 6930 Toll-Free 1 888 488 6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpUbh7dp3mtF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
