On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Jim Knoble wrote:

> If window menus don't have titlebars, then they can't be torn off.
> Your point is moot.  Half the purpose of the close button would be to serve
> as an indication that the menu is torn off (the other half is to
> provide a method for the non-expert user to close the menu).

That the menu is visible suggests that its torn off.  My point is far from
moot.  Consistency is pretty important, and adding a close button is not
only inconsistent, its just redundant.  The non-expert user should
probably be using GNOME or KDE.

> : If you bothered to look, torn off menus _are_ inaccessible from
> : parent menus.  I would prefer that they be accessible, but my point
> : was centered around the current state of affairs.
>
> Ahem.  Believe me, i have "bothered".  The status quo isn't necessarily
> the optimal state of affairs.

I agree.  However, when I first commented on this, I was speaking about
the status quo.

> : By the way, you seem to have a fairly definitive idea of good/bad
> : design.
>
> Yes.  If you don't, you might begin reading some of these:

I do.  I happen to think your idea is misguided in some areas.

> : You need to realize that you do not define the merit of a design for
> : the rest of us.
>
> I don't claim to.  Others have already.

You did.

> As you say, it's problematic, and should be carefully considered,
> probably by Jeff an Brad.

I think the fewer key-mouse combinations, the better.  Alt-mouse solves a
problem that requires it, I believe your solution is unnecessarily
complicated.

> : > There's not really any reason not to open another copy of a torn-off
> : > menu when its item is chosen in the parent menu.  This could be
> : > particularly important for keyboard navigation of menus.
> :
> : See previous messages re: "this will only add a few kb to blackbox"
>
> Whatever.  We're all relying on Jeff and Brad to carefully consider
> design decisions.

I am not relying on Jeff to do anything.  If I don't like the way Jeff
approaches development, I won't use his code.

-- 
Gregory J. Barlow               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
336.558.7231                    http://barlow.ncssm.net

Reply via email to