On Thu, Feb07,02 10:06, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb07,02 10:42, Marco Fioretti wrote: > > > > Head on over to > > > > > > > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-02-06-010-20-RV-DT-SW > > > And then, aside from that... I'm curious... the author states this: > > > > "Fluxbox also adds a native key grabber to the base functionality it > > inherits from Blackbox. The key grabber gives the ability to not only handle > > keyboard shortcuts for common window manager commands, but it also allows > > sophisticated multi-key sequences to be assigned in a manner similar to > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Emacs." > > > > Now, considering his false statement regarding the slit, is the keygrabbing > > ability EXACTLY like emacs'? or what? > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Why would you assume the keybindings are *exactly* as in Emacs, if the > author says they are *similar*? I haven't read the article, but from > what you quoted here, I can't find any false information[1]. > > -Jan > > P.S.: Not using Fluxbox, I have no idea anyway ;-) If fluxbox does > *not* include a keygrabber, or if that keygrabber does not allow > "multi-key sequences" *similar* to Emacs, I'll gladly call the author a > liar and claim that "he doesn't get it". >
If it pleases the court, I will rephrase. "How similar to emacs are they keybindings?" Better yet... I should just try it out. :) DC -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. Registered Linux User Number 195825
