Randy McMurchy wrote: > Richard A Downing wrote these words on 08/17/05 11:53 CST: > > >>Works fine. > > > Yes, it seems to. However, my concern is because in the patch header > it says: > > Upstream Status: Applied >
Clearly it has NOT been applied upstream to the gcc-3.3.x branch - it might be in gcc-3.4 or gcc-4.0 though and the same patch-comment would apply. Another patch with the same effect might have been, but patch complains bitterly if (as you know) you apply a patch twice. Not being up on things GCC-internally at the Ryan/Greg level I can't say if the gcc people have another way of avoiding whatever problem the gurus say our patch cures :-) You would, presumably, only tell by building KDE or one of the Mozzys with it - and I only build it to get a libstdc++.so.5 for binary drivers like my lexmark printer - so for me it probably doesn't matter either way. (Greg or Ryan or your good self, might like to tell me I'm wrong (again) :-) Best I can do. Richard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
