Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 09/01/05 22:46 CST: > Do we have any idea why these are overwritten? A remnant of old glibc's > requiring it? Perhaps a diff between the old and new .h files might > give a clue.
I have no idea why they overwrite the files. There are, however, significant differences. I'm content to run with the Glibc files and see what happens as I compile programs linking to Heimdal. > If you delete these .h files and disable the building of libss > libraries, does the package still build and run? No. I'm not sure the libss is an issue. As I mentioned in my reply to Tushar, I've been running with the Heimdal version of libss for almost two years without issues. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:51:00 up 152 days, 22:24, 3 users, load average: 0.22, 0.24, 0.22 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
