On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:32 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 2/7/07, Andrew Beverley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I don't mean modules as such. I mean extensions. Each > > target/match for iptables has its own extension. > > Yeah, you're right. Could you show the exact errors? I'm guessing that > our kernel headers are just too old in LFS-6.2.
I don't think the kernel headers are too old, but there's not an error as such for the following reasons: The extensions that require the headers all have a hidden test script located in the extensions directory. For example the connbytes extension has a test script iptables-1.3.x/extensions/.connbytes-test The test script checks to see if the headers it needs exist, and if they don't then it simply isn't compiled. Thus no errors are generated. If it were to be compiled then errors such as missing header files would be displayed. Regards, Andy Beverley -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
