Andrew Beverley wrote these words on 02/07/07 10:11 CST:

> So unless there is a really good reason for not using the KERNEL_DIR
> variable, I would suggest that, at a minimum, the book is changed to
> state that KERNEL_DIR should always be set.

Well, this issue goes back years. And we consider a package broken
if it requires raw kernel headers. We'll have to work on this, but
for now, and for version 6.2.0, nothing will change. The current
(6.2.0) instructions work.

Using raw kernel headers will be an absolute last recourse. I
don't think that unless there's a major philosophy change, we'll
end up doing it.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
10:17:00 up 28 days, 10:31, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.00
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to