On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:59 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Andrew Beverley wrote these words on 02/07/07 10:25 CST:
> 
> > Hmmm, they don't work :-) There's about a dozen extensions that
> > (silently) don't get compiled or installed.
> 
> Yes, I see that now. Thanks, Andy.
> 
> 
> > Okay, how about as a compromise, at least a note stating that for some
> > extensions you have to provide the KERNEL_DIR variable? I spent ages
> > working out why the extensions were missing - like I say they fail
> > silently so it looks like everything has worked until you try using that
> > match or target.
> > 
> > On another note, can you still change to version 1.3.6?
> 
> Not sure what to do here. It sure seems it wants raw kernel headers.

As per the other post that I've just sent, I think the problem is that
the sanitized headers are a bit out of date. I guess the best thing to
do for the time being is just include a note outlining this
conversation. I've seen this in other places in the book - it's quite
handy for a bit of education if nothing else.

Andy


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to