On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:59 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Andrew Beverley wrote these words on 02/07/07 10:25 CST: > > > Hmmm, they don't work :-) There's about a dozen extensions that > > (silently) don't get compiled or installed. > > Yes, I see that now. Thanks, Andy. > > > > Okay, how about as a compromise, at least a note stating that for some > > extensions you have to provide the KERNEL_DIR variable? I spent ages > > working out why the extensions were missing - like I say they fail > > silently so it looks like everything has worked until you try using that > > match or target. > > > > On another note, can you still change to version 1.3.6? > > Not sure what to do here. It sure seems it wants raw kernel headers.
As per the other post that I've just sent, I think the problem is that the sanitized headers are a bit out of date. I guess the best thing to do for the time being is just include a note outlining this conversation. I've seen this in other places in the book - it's quite handy for a bit of education if nothing else. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
