On 2/7/07, Barius Drubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 17:55, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > builds against the sanitized headers, too. I suppose we could add a > > note that says you can build more extensions against the raw kernel > > sources at your own risk. > > Isn't it a really bad idea to be building against a different version > of kernel headers than used to build libc? > ... or is that what you mean by "at your own risk"? ;-)
It sure is what I meant. Although, presumably this isn't that dangerous since the iptables people recommend you do it and most of them are pretty closely involved in the kernel, too. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
