El Lunes, 26 de Marzo de 2007 22:25, Dan Nicholson escribió: > Looks OK to me. I don't really like that huge longindex.html. But > that's just my vote. We should probably wait until Matthew gets back > before making a final decision.
I agree, Matthew and Randy are the ones that should take the decision. > If you could do that in the xsl branch, that would be great. I have an > idea of how it would look, but I'm not certain. I think you should > feel free to run any experiments in that branch. The new-xsl branch don't contains the book XML files. Yes, if this new Index is implemented we will need to create a branch on each project book to make the XML changes and do a full merge when ready (a lot of work for me). I'm making now a POC with only Bash, Bzip2, and Ncurses and using the upstream Index code to can have a global idea about how it works and what need be hacked. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
