matthew wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:25:14 -0700, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Looks OK to me. I don't really like that huge longindex.html. But >> that's just my vote. We should probably wait until Matthew gets back >> before making a final decision. > > Well, I'm still on vacation. After several days of nice weather, the current rain has forced me indoors :-( > > After reading the discussion on this, I'm not sure that anything should be done with the indexes. > > My personal preference would be to have the 'Up' link point to a per-chapter index, or, failing that, remove it entirely as the only other sensible place I can think of it pointing to would be to the main index.html page, which is where 'Home' already links to.
I think you mean TOC here, not index. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page