M.Canales.es wrote these words on 03/26/07 15:44 CST: > El Lunes, 26 de Marzo de 2007 22:31, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > >> A table of contents for each chapter would be useful, > > That is easy to add, if wanted. In the first times it was here, but latter > was > decided to remove it, I don't remember wy.
I can't honestly say I'd find individual chapter indexes useful. Chances are someone is using the index to find out what chapter/file something is in. Seems it would be frustrating. Perhaps I'm not thinking it through, though. > BLFS longindex.html is > 700 Kb, that take some time to load on a browser. > That's the principal reason for the propossal. I'm sitting on the fence here. On one hand, I like the idea of individual indexes for packages/libraries/programs/etc. because of the reduced sizes and faster loading times. But on the other hand I don't want to have to open up multiple indexes to find what I'm looking for. I'll wait for others input, but I can't really offer anything for or against Manuel's proposal other than I lean (note that isn't anything firm) towards leaving the index as is. I just loaded it in a browser over the Internet (broadband) on a slow computer and it took just 7 seconds. For that little of time, the convenience of having everything together seems a bit better than the alternative. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 15:48:00 up 17 days, 13:47, 1 user, load average: 0.27, 0.07, 0.02 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
