On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Randy McMurchy <ra...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 07/24/09 16:28 CST: > > [snip getting ugly stuff] > > Tobias has sent a personal apology via email to me. His apology is > accepted. He made good points in his post. In fact, the BDB rejection > may have been a bit steep by Guy. But let's get past all that. > > BLFS is indeed way behind. I suggest we just update to the newest > releases of packages and see what breaks. I can't promise I can help > build many packages, but I will review commits. >
So as a total newbie to BLFS development, what would the best course of action be? Just get a recent LFS system running and start building the latest and greatest packages from the BLFS book (the base libraries were mentioned as a good starting point)? I've got some spare time I could commit to building packages but I'm unsure of what the proper testing procedures are. At this point are we worried about just the package itself building and not so much the repercussions of other packages that depend on it? Thanks, Eujon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
