>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I understand your point, but I was thinking of the future. It's true that > any > package we update now should be against 6.5. The absence of a line that > says > "Last Reviewed means that it was before 6.5. > > In the future, if we get behind again, then the Last Checked line does > provide > some useful information. > > For the present, it gives a quick check (without searching through 200+ > tickets) > that a package was reviewed recently and doesn't need further review right > now. > > I think its a reasonable approach, even if we want to remove it for a > release. >
It certainly should not be rendered in the finished book, however, a simple comment under the first block, for each package certainly wouldn't hurt anything. <!-- Last checked against LFS-6.5. --> -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
