DJ Lucas wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I understand your point, but I was thinking of the future. It's true that >> any >> package we update now should be against 6.5. The absence of a line that >> says >> "Last Reviewed means that it was before 6.5. >> >> In the future, if we get behind again, then the Last Checked line does >> provide >> some useful information. >> >> For the present, it gives a quick check (without searching through 200+ >> tickets) >> that a package was reviewed recently and doesn't need further review right >> now. >> >> I think its a reasonable approach, even if we want to remove it for a >> release. >> > > It certainly should not be rendered in the finished book, however, a > simple comment under the first block, for each package certainly wouldn't > hurt anything. > > <!-- Last checked against LFS-6.5. -->
Well my thought was to render it so you didn't have to look at tickets/source, but you did trigger an idea. How about putting in a temporary note with a <para role='dev'>Comment</para> and then be able to make that render or not via the xsl. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
