Em 11-07-2013 20:14, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I >> think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken >> touched it. >> > > Not me - I've never used it. The reason the versions are so far > behind is that none of the current editors use it. It isn't a > trivial build, so nobody touches it. Similar thing with gnucash, > although getting that to build looks easier thanks to your, and > Andy's, work. Despite your current problem, you are the nearest > we have to an expert.
Thanks, ĸen. For gnucash, the patch provided by Armin was and is responsible for it to work. His support was decisive for Andy to reconsider putting it back to the book. Believe this patch was Armin's first contribution to BLFS. > From memory, fedora are mostly up-to-date with packages like this - > have you looked at fedora cgit to see if they do anything that looks > as if it might be relevant ? I guess they might apply the > proverbial load of patches, but hopefully many of those (or the > changelog in the specfile) might indicate what they fix. Similarly, > the Arch PKGBUILD might show something interesting. Thanks again. Encouraged by your post, tried and found a fix. Then read DJ's mails and turned out he was (as usual) right, he gave the right solution. Will write it in the reply to DJ. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
