Em 02-03-2014 21:42, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:16:44PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> We just released LFS-7.5 and we need to look at releasing BLFS-7.5 in >> the next few days. AFAIK, all the 7.5 tickets are complete and all the >> packages tagged for 7.5. It is just a matter of doing the release, but >> I'm sure that there are some tweaks that are necessary. >> >> For planning purposes, I think we can target Wednesday. March 5. >> >> Comments? >> > The --libexecdir switches still look a bit iffy to me. > > 1. The following use --libexecdir with what I think are adequate > explanations of why: vte2, acl, dhcpcd. Anyone who disagrees : > please speak up! > > 2. The following explain an optional --libexecdir switch: gnupg2, > emacs, librep, geoclue. I don't have a problem with leaving this > sort of thing in for a transitional period while people may still be > using older versions of LFS (does 3 years sound about right?), BUT > > (i.) the markup is '<parameter>', I think it hould be '<option>' ? > > (ii.) should we also do this for all other existing BLFS packages > which now use /usr/libexec ? > > 3. Subversion used to run a subshell to interrogate apxs. The > current page looks unusual, but I haven't any desire to build it for > 7.5 (I only rebuilt my server in September), so I have to assume it > is ok ?
More or less. I am comparing the two versions in BLFS svn and 7.4 (It is very good to having releases, so to easily comparing instructions versions. In "Command Explanations", of svn (7.5-rc1) I think we should write the complete switch, or it is almost useless: s|=...|=$(/usr/bin/apxs -q libexecdir)| In configure, I don't know how to handle the switch alone "--with-apache-libexecdir" > > 4. The following are still doing things the old way: > menu-cache, qemu, openbox, mc, pulseaudio. Is there any reason why > these should NOT drop --libexecdir ? menu-cache and openbox are my faults. I can fix them. The difference between my opinions and nothing are as small as the majority here wants. But I did not pay attention to this libexec drop subject at the beginning and it bothered a lot, during tags. So, I would like to propose that these kind of things should never be left for the tfreeze/tag stage, but be done before or after, in the future. Just tagging is hard enough a work. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
