Ken Moffat wrote: > I see that the following create directories in /usr/libexec, I > suppose that we need to document these [ possibly, some are already > done, I haven't checked that yet ] :
> > file-roller, > gedit, > git (creates git-core/), > gjs, > gnome-system-monitor, > gstreamer (both, they create -0.10 and -1.0), > mc, > menu-cache, > pulse (turns out I've already built this - the directory is empty on > my pulse-avoiding system), For me it's $ find /usr/libexec -type d /usr/libexec /usr/libexec/gcc /usr/libexec/emacs /usr/libexec/awk /usr/libexec/gstreamer-1.0 /usr/libexec/getconf /usr/libexec/gstreamer-0.10 /usr/libexec/mc /usr/libexec/sudo /usr/libexec/coreutils /usr/libexec/man-db I removed some subdirectories. Obviously gcc, awk, coreutils, and man-db come from LFS. There are several other entries in /usr/libexec that are not in subdirectories. I rebuilt pulse in a DESTDIR: $ ls usr/libexec/ -R usr/libexec/: pulse usr/libexec/pulse: gconf-helper proximity-helper > sudo, > xscreensaver, > totem. > > I can pick up any/all of this, including removing the old command > explanations, but I'd like to confirm that the directories in > /usr/libexec should be documented, please. Yes, just mentioning them in the Installed Directories line is enough. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
