On 03/03/2014 11:22 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > The full switch --with-apache-libexecdir=$(/usr/bin/apxs -q libexecdir) is not > very good, because it runs apxs unconditionally, even if apache is not > installed. Since apxs is part of apache, it throws a warning (IIRC again) when > apache is not there. Since the behavior is the same without the =$(...) > part, I do not see a reason for having it. Now removing the switch completely > is not wrong either. >
I disagree. libexecdir is for "executables" that shouldn't be run by user. Apache modules are not "executables" there are rather DSO's. Another reason is that all modules are in /usr/lib/httpd/modules, so that would be a non-standard location. As a side note, I believe that svn instructions should also contain instructions to use those modules for setting up svn over http:// but that's not very important. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
