Em 14-02-2014 09:01, akhiezer escreveu: >> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:42:47 -0300 >> From: Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br> >> To: BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> >> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Iced Tea 2.4.1 and iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown >> option to `s' >> >> Em 14-02-2014 06:14, m...@pc-networking-services.com escreveu: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is my second attempt to post this here. I beat the confirmation >>> e-mail by posting to the list and receieve the bounce that it was waiting >>> the list moderators approval and that was on the 5th. >>> >>> I have also posted this error on the devleopers website on the 3rd of Feb >>> and no responce there either. >> >> I cannot find your message in my archives nor at: >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org/maillist.html >> >> What do you mean by "developers website"? Please, can you give me the >> address, or title of the post, something to help me finding your report >> from the 3rd? >> > > > Fernando, maybe: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.distro-packaging.devel/26154 > > >>> > . > . >>> >>> It would seem that if the developer is not even interested in >>> acknowledging the error that we are on our own with it. >> >> The developer is interested, but it is the first time he is hearing >> about this problem. >> >>> > > > Ref. ibid.
Thanks, akh. Just adding what seems the original link: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1665 I have seen that Armin also replied. I am trying to understand this better, and have found that configure and configure.ac have mentions to lsb_release. I am trying to understand if it is a required, recommended or optional dependency. However, in one machine I do not have it installed and it gives me linux-gnu and builds fine, so, I am intending to add as optional. What do you all think about this? I cannot understand why Christopher's is getting n/a. In the following, I am writing some observations and guesses. In configure, for 2.4.4, which is a build dir still in place in yet another machine, I see: {{{ if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release", so it can be a program name with args. set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release; ac_word=$2 { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for $ac_word" >&5 $as_echo_n "checking for $ac_word... " >&6; } if ${ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE+:} false; then : $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 else case $LSB_RELEASE in [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE="$LSB_RELEASE" # Let the user override the test with a path. ;; *) as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR }}} Also, I noticed that he is building at /opt, so probably as root. I have: {{{ $ xzgrep -C6 distro_name /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2.4.5-2014.01.29-18h12m38s.log.xz rm -f /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java rm -f /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp /bin/sed -e 's/@@launcher_name@@/java/g' \ -e 's/@@java_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs/g' \ -e 's/@@java_runtime_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs-b31/g' \ -e 's/@@jdk_derivative_name@@/IcedTea 2.4.5/g' \ -e 's/@@distro_name@@/Linux From Scratch/g' \ -e 's/@@distro_package_version@@/'7u51-2.4.5-blfs'/g' \ -e 's/@@java_runtime_name@@/OpenJDK Runtime Environment/g' \ -e 's/@@jdk_revid@@//g' \ -e 's/@@hotspot_revid@@//g' \ ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/Version.java.template > /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/openjdk-boot/jdk/make/java/version' }}} I remember having sometime ago problems with PATH, for some packages, if I build as root, and for those, I have a line in the script: source /etc/profile and the PATH is well defined, because he needs: export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java && export PATH="$PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-bin/bin" or similar, if the binary is another one, i.e., the binary has to be in the path, and, in my case, it is provided by: /etc/profile.d/openjdk.sh which is defined in OJDK/Icedtea BLFS page. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
