This indicates that the upgrades are due to HSTS, so this is unrelated to
HTTPS-Upgrades (this new feature). bloomberg.com is currently on the HSTS
preload list, which also applies to subdomains.

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 5:18 PM Shezan Baig <shezbaig...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see the following in the netlog:
>
> t= 97 [st= 0]      TRANSPORT_SECURITY_STATE_SHOULD_UPGRADE_TO_SSL
>
> *                   --> get_sts_state_result = true  <--- this is false in
> the m115 build*                   --> host = "dsbeta.prod.bloomberg.com"
>                    --> host_found_in_hsts_bypass_list = false
>                    --> should_upgrade_to_ssl = true
> t= 97 [st= 0]     +URL_REQUEST_START_JOB  [dt=25]
>                    --> initiator = "not an origin"
>                    --> load_flags = 65792 (CAN_USE_RESTRICTED_PREFETCH |
> MAIN_FRAME_DEPRECATED)
>                    --> method = "GET"
>                    --> network_isolation_key = "http://bloomberg.com
> http://bloomberg.com";
>                    --> request_type = "main frame"
>                    --> site_for_cookies = "SiteForCookies: {site=
> http://bloomberg.com; schemefully_same=true}"
>                    --> url = "
> http://dsbeta.prod.bloomberg.com/vrs2021/viewer/index.html";
> t= 97 [st= 0]        URL_REQUEST_REDIRECT_JOB
>                      --> reason = "HSTS"
> t= 97 [st= 0]        URL_REQUEST_FAKE_RESPONSE_HEADERS_CREATED
>                      --> HTTP/1.1 307 Internal Redirect
>                          Location:
> https://dsbeta.prod.bloomberg.com/vrs2021/viewer/index.html
>                          Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: Cross-Origin
>                          Non-Authoritative-Reason: HSTS
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:12 PM Shezan Baig <shezbaig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am using a locally built chrome.exe (so not one of the Canary/Dev/Beta
>> channels), and doing the following:
>>
>> 116.0.5845.14/chrome.exe --proxy-server=<internal-proxy> http://
>> <internal-url>
>>
>> This causes the <internal-proxy> to get a "CONNECT <internal-url>:443",
>> which unfortunately the proxy is not currently configured to handle
>> properly (it blocks and times out after a minute).  I can fix the
>> <internal-proxy> to handle it correctly, but rolling out that change may
>> take a while.
>>
>> In the meantime, I'm trying to workaround the issue by doing:
>>
>> 116.0.5845.14/chrome.exe --disable-features=HttpsUpgrades
>> --proxy-server=<internal-proxy> http://<internal-url>
>>
>> However, that doesn't seem to make any difference (proxy is still getting
>> a "CONNECT <internal-url>:443").
>>
>> Note that our previous build (115.0.5790.32) does not do these upgrades,
>> so I don't need any disable-feature switch for the m115 build.  However,
>> the m116 build does these upgrades with or without the disable-feature
>> switch.
>>
>> Also note that these are locally built chromium binaries (not "Google
>> Chrome"), so it will not participate in the 50% experiments.
>>
>> Thanks for your quick response!
>> -shez-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:47 PM Chris Thompson <cth...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you provide more information on what is occurring (or maybe
>>> better: file a bug at crbug.com/new with details and link it here)?
>>> That's the correct flag to force-disable the feature (you can also disable
>>> it during the experimental period in chrome://flags/#https-upgrades).
>>>
>>> Note that Chrome has other existing features which upgrade certain
>>> navigations to HTTPS (such as schemeless URLs entered into the Omnibox), so
>>> you may be seeing those instead. HTTPS-Upgrades is currently only enabled
>>> at 50% in Chrome Canary/Dev/Beta.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:43 PM Shezan Baig <shezbaig...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>> Is there a way to disable this feature?  I tried running the browser
>>>> with " --disable-features=HttpsUpgrades", but it still seems to be
>>>> performing these upgrades.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -shez-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 7:13:38 PM UTC-4 cth...@chromium.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emailscth...@chromium.org, dad...@google.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer
>>>>> https://github.com/dadrian/https-upgrade/blob/main/explainer.md
>>>>>
>>>>> Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Automatically and optimistically upgrade all main-frame navigations to
>>>>> HTTPS, with fast fallback to HTTP.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink componentInternals>Network>SSL
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3ENetwork%3ESSL>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG reviewFetch change process does not mention a TAG review,
>>>>> therefore this is N/A (https://github.com/whatwg/fetch#pull-requests)
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/800) Firefox is
>>>>> offering a similar feature already in their private browsing mode by 
>>>>> default
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/185)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals. This feature is not exposed directly to
>>>>> web developers or users. However, HTTPS adoption is now standard practice
>>>>> (>90% of page loads in Chrome use HTTPS), and automatically upgrading
>>>>> navigations to HTTPS would avoid unnecessary redirects from HTTP to HTTPS
>>>>> for site owners. The `upgrade-insecure-requests` header has some similar
>>>>> functionality, and according to HTTP-Archive is found on ~6% of all
>>>>> requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> Chrome will upgrade these navigations to HTTPS using a 307 internal
>>>>> redirect, which will be visible in the Network panel of Developer Tools.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?No
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently not available on Android WebView. We are implementing this
>>>>> first for Chrome and will consider bringing this to WebView (likely as an
>>>>> embedder opt-in) as follow up work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?No
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag namehttps-upgrades
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?True
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1394910
>>>>>
>>>>> Launch bughttps://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4235192
>>>>>
>>>>> Sample links
>>>>> http://example.com will upgrade to https://example.com.
>>>>> http://www.alwayshttp.com will upgrade to https://www.alwayshttp.com but
>>>>> fall back to http://www.alwayshttp.com because the site doesn't
>>>>> support HTTPS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 115
>>>>> Shipping on Android 115
>>>>>
>>>>> We are planning to do a field trial to gradually roll out this feature
>>>>> to Chrome clients in Chrome 115.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6056181032812544
>>>>>
>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to prototype:
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/mgJqym5-Xek/m/0EAN6v7CCQAJ
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CALMy46S7P-3hmZAkXrFb_jPQ3eRGTcyVmWLBWZANHr40wnQ_tQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to