On 03.12.2012 00:40, Olemis Lang wrote: > ... thus I won't try to influence your decision about non-JS support anymore .
Just to be clear, it's not my decision. I'm only a mentor, not a developer, and as such have no vote in these kinds of decisions. I do however feel responsible for the project, which is why I'm arguing so loudly for what I believe is the right thing to do. If the bloodhound dev community decides otherwise, I won't stand in your way. > My best guess at the reason for this is that it's /hard/ to write a > Javascript-less fallback for a good UI. The 80/20 rule would certainly > apply. > > Nonetheless if we are going to see Atlassian as a reference , just > know that I am not fond of their (recent?) decisions to turn > functional software into beautiful but useless tools . Ha. :) > FWIW I hope you'll understand why I second previous comments posted by > Gary and Joachim , and also that this does not mean that I think you > are wrong . Probably we are just looking at the same subject from a > different perspective . Certainly. And I'm not arguing with you, presonally; I'm arguing against what I think is, effectively, harmful premature optimization. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
