On 12/3/12, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 December 2012 13:40, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 03/12/12 09:43, Andrej Golcov wrote: >> >>> DESKTOP BROWSER ("official" support) >>>>> - Google Chrome on Windows and OSX >>>>> - Mozilla Firefox on Windows and OSX >>>>> >>>> + Opera ;) >>>> ... and add GNU/Linux to OS list ... preferably Ubuntu . >>>> >>>>> - IE on Windows >>>>> >>>> I would strongly agree with Branko that, currently, Bloodhound effort >>> should concentrate on 80/20 approach in order to survive e.g. get user >>> base. >>> >>> If we take browser statistic ([1] and [2]), we get: Chrome, FF, IE on >>> Win >>> and (optionally) OSX . >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_stats.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp> >>> [2] >>> http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_os.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp> >> >> I can live with the limit on 'official' support to the original set >> stated >> by Peter. It seems to me that, in relation to issues associated with >> browsers outside the official set, this implies: >> >> 1. patches may be submitted to fix bugs associated with any OS/browser >> combination but such patches must not compromise the officially >> supported set. >> 2. tickets for bugs that are identified as only affecting browsers >> outside the supported set are likely to be reduced in priority and >> moved out of the release milestones. >> >> >> Is this good enough for everyone? >>
Ok . I'll be submitting patches for Opera since , in practice , it's the most performant under my circumstances . Firefox is too slow , Chrome is slow (not like Firefox but still is) and is lacking many features I need ... and MSIE + Safari are not available on GNU/Linux . Hope you don't mind . -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
