Agree
On 3 December 2012 13:40, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/12/12 09:43, Andrej Golcov wrote:
>
>> DESKTOP BROWSER ("official" support)
>>>> - Google Chrome on Windows and OSX
>>>> - Mozilla Firefox on Windows and OSX
>>>>
>>> + Opera ;)
>>> ... and add GNU/Linux to OS list ... preferably Ubuntu .
>>>
>>>> - IE on Windows
>>>>
>>> I would strongly agree with Branko that, currently, Bloodhound effort
>> should concentrate on 80/20 approach in order to survive e.g. get user
>> base.
>>
>> If we take browser statistic ([1] and [2]), we get: Chrome, FF, IE on Win
>> and (optionally) OSX .
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_stats.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp>
>> [2]
>> http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_os.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp>
>>
>> Regards, Andrej
>>
>>
>>
> I can live with the limit on 'official' support to the original set stated
> by Peter. It seems to me that, in relation to issues associated with
> browsers outside the official set, this implies:
>
> 1. patches may be submitted to fix bugs associated with any OS/browser
> combination but such patches must not compromise the officially
> supported set.
> 2. tickets for bugs that are identified as only affecting browsers
> outside the supported set are likely to be reduced in priority and
> moved out of the release milestones.
>
>
> Is this good enough for everyone?
>
> In terms of rendering engines, we will effectively be supporting WebKit,
> Gecko and Trident so, unless there is any major discrepancies between
> implementations of the cross platform engines across their platforms, we
> should have good coverage overall.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
>
