Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > > Can I see the adjustments/changes to the proposal then please? > > The proposal, as stated in my previous emails, is related to the eventual > "de-atticisation" of the project. > Again, for this to be constructive, could you please suggest concrete changes to the proposed policy?
> The proposal was meant to ask if your project would benefit from being > supported by TDF and in which ways. > Thanks. That is good to know. > Having articles stating "The LibreOffice team has been working on a > port to browser-hosted WebAssembly"(1) or the page you created on > TDF's wiki describing the WASM project(2) without specifying who > leads it and what could be the eventual distribution limitations, > may suggest to some that the project is hosted and developed by/for > TDF, that's the reading some may have of the "LibreOffice > team/developers/other variants", and that will be bound to TDF's > objective to make it "available for use by anyone free of charge". > Let's please finally decouple this discussion, Paolo. I'll refrain from answering in this thread, that repeatedly conflates many things. On the above: are you asking me to remove public documentation on how to build the WASM port, and what it is? A private answer is fine, and then we can continue this discussion (if there's anything left to clarify) else-thread. This really has nothing to do with the atticisation proposal. Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
