--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's easy enough to test it with a little program that prints the > value you have.
OK, OK, OK, David. I know that MIPSpro == EDG 238, what I don't know is which EDG version fixes the problem. Is this better? Index: is_base_and_derived.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/type_traits/is_base_and_derived.hpp,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -r1.4 is_base_and_derived.hpp 27c27,31 < #if !defined(__BORLANDC__) --- > #if !defined(__BORLANDC__) \ > && !(defined(__EDG_VERSION__) && __EDG_VERSION__ <= 238) > // The EDG version number is a lower estimate. > // It is not currently known which EDG version > // exactly fixes the problem. > (failed-as-expected) ... > **passed** ... > > unless -d0 caused that to be suppressed, in which case we should > remove the -d0 I guess. I don't use -d0, but I don't see that **passed** message anywhere. Something else is not right: The other "fail" tests are only built once, but the as_to_python_function.cpp test is built each time I enter bjam again. That's why you see the failure on our auto-built "test" pages. Ralf __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
