"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Is the __BORLANDC__ branch different from (not as good as) the >> > is_base_and_derived implementation in 1.29.0? >> >> cvs diff knows for sure. > > Sure, but this "chasing tails" game is impractical. If nobody else > cares about MIPSpro compatibility we will just keep using 1.29.0.
What will you do when 1.31.0 comes out? > I'd like to suggest opening a 1.29 maintenance branch. I've > accumulated a few minor patches that make Boost.Python 1.29.0 > compatible with Python 2.3. If I could check these patches in they > would be available to everybody. You're welcome to do that as far as I'm concerned. I think it would be better to make the trunk work, but only you can decide what's worth spending your time on. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
