--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is the __BORLANDC__ branch different from (not as good as) the > > is_base_and_derived implementation in 1.29.0? > > cvs diff knows for sure.
Sure, but this "chasing tails" game is impractical. If nobody else cares about MIPSpro compatibility we will just keep using 1.29.0. I'd like to suggest opening a 1.29 maintenance branch. I've accumulated a few minor patches that make Boost.Python 1.29.0 compatible with Python 2.3. If I could check these patches in they would be available to everybody. Ralf __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
