Vladimir Prus wrote: > > There've been a fair amount of suggested changes, many of which are > > documented on Wiki [1], and since the author himself keeps track of > > the issues, I won't reiterate them here - except for stressing the > > need for > > > > a) extensively reworked and extended documentation, and > > Completely agree. > > > b) resolving the 'wchar_t' support issue before the library makes > > into official Boost distribution. > > I'm actually not that happy about solving general issue alone...
You don't have to. I am sure a lot of people on this list have dealt with the issue and would be happy to help you out. > but let it be. I assume I've not asked to implement any specific > approach, and can decide myself? I think the general conclusion was that one should be able to use both 'char' and 'wchar_t' versions of the library facilities in the same program. Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
