Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >> > b) resolving the 'wchar_t' support issue before the library makes >> > into official Boost distribution. >> >> I'm actually not that happy about solving general issue alone... > > You don't have to. I am sure a lot of people on this list have dealt > with the issue and would be happy to help you out.
Ok, let's hope so. >> but let it be. I assume I've not asked to implement any specific >> approach, and can decide myself? > > I think the general conclusion was that one should be able to use both > 'char' and 'wchar_t' versions of the library facilities in the same > program. Ehm... in fact I gleaned quite the opposite conclusion, and can't understand the need to use both in the same program. Anyway, I'm planning to use preprocessor-based solution, so can support this use case, too. - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
