> From: "Matthew J. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Is there anyone on the list that is also recieving posts twice with about a
> 30-32 minute delay between each message?
>
> odd...
>
Not really. It is an unfortunate side effect of the reply-to header for the list
being changed to the sender instead of the list. Most people just hit group
reply (reply all, whatever) in order to get the list in the to header. So you
are getting one copy from the list and one from the sender directly.
May I take this oportunity to vote for a return to the old method. I know there
are some lengthly rants on this subject, but my personal experience is that I
almost never reply to the sender instead of the list. So for me, the default of
reply going to the list is the preferable (lazy) option. And it avoids the
double copy problem, which is a bit annoying (though just a bit).
--------------------------
Sean Quinlan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bmerc-www.bu.edu/
"You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of
conversation" - Plato
