[forwarded - mistaken by majordomo as an admin request -- rjk]
From: Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 17:13:23 -0500
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] double postings?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:23 PM 3.1.2001 -0500, Mark Dulcey wrote:
>And may I take this opportunity to dissent? I don't find getting two
>copies of a message annoying, but I DO find having to retype the email
>address when I want to send a private reply (what happens when the
>reply-to header is set to the list) very annoying.
FWIW, another list I'm on has two modes -- reply to sender ("pure") and
reply to list ("plain"). People subscribe to one or the other list as they
choose (almost all on the plain version, but no one forced to pick one
method over the other), but all the content is identical otherwise.
Seems like a very clean solution that keeps everyone happy, if you feel
like setting up the list software and policies to accomodate it.
(...Yes, I'm a new to the list -- just thought this worth mentioning. Back
to lurk mode...)
--
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmaster work: 781.221.5372
Skillcheck cell: 617.365.0585
