Hi
( 01.01.03 16:14 -0500 ) Sean Quinlan:
> May I take this oportunity to vote for a return to the old method. I
> know there are some lengthly rants on this subject, but my personal
> experience is that I almost never reply to the sender instead of the
> list. So for me, the default of reply going to the list is the
> preferable (lazy) option. And it avoids the double copy problem, which
> is a bit annoying (though just a bit).
Of course, you could just get a mail client [mutt] that allows you to
reply to whomever you want to.
I really don't care how it's set up.
--
\js
You must do the things you think you cannot do.
-Eleanor Roosevelt
