Sean Quinlan wrote:
>
> > From: "Matthew J. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Is there anyone on the list that is also recieving posts twice with about a
> > 30-32 minute delay between each message?
> >
> > odd...
> >
> Not really. It is an unfortunate side effect of the reply-to header for the list
> being changed to the sender instead of the list. Most people just hit group
> reply (reply all, whatever) in order to get the list in the to header. So you
> are getting one copy from the list and one from the sender directly.
>
> May I take this oportunity to vote for a return to the old method. I know there
> are some lengthly rants on this subject, but my personal experience is that I
> almost never reply to the sender instead of the list. So for me, the default of
> reply going to the list is the preferable (lazy) option. And it avoids the
> double copy problem, which is a bit annoying (though just a bit).
And may I take this opportunity to dissent? I don't find getting two
copies of a message annoying, but I DO find having to retype the email
address when I want to send a private reply (what happens when the
reply-to header is set to the list) very annoying.
