Ronald J Kimball wrote:
Tom Metro wrote:
It seems less and less likely that there will be a definitive cut-over point where a pure Perl 6 code base will be released.

Instead is seems like they will asymptotically approach the Perl 6 spec through incremental releases of Perl 5. That seems like a sound strategy, but could make implementing internal architecture changes rather challenging.

I think you have some misconceptions about the relationship between Perl 5
and Perl 6.  Perl 6 is essentially a new language that happens to
share some history and syntax with Perl 1-5.

I realize that Perl 6, both from a language design and internal architecture perspective, was always intended to be a ground-up redesign.

However, the ideals of a plan and the practical reality don't always match up. There isn't exactly a production-ready Perl 6, or even anything close to it, to make the case that a pure Perl 6 is a viable alternative to evolving Perl 5.

I'd rather see the products of the Perl 6 "blue sky" design end up being incorporated into Perl 5, than to have those ideas effectively shelved waiting for a Perl 6 platform that may never adequately materialize.


The ongoing development of Perl 5 is not aimed at implementing
the Perl 6 spec.

That may not be the primary goal, but it seems to be what is happening for the past few releases.

 -Tom

--
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/

_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Reply via email to