Deborah Harrell wrote: > >But as I also stated, while the Jeffco sheriff's >office says that 'print info won't be used unless >fraud is involved, the example of the misuse of >information-gathering by a nearby law enforcement >agency (Denver City Police) does not engender my >confidence. I must add that I think the vast majority >of law-enforcement folks are good people trying to do >difficult, dangerous work - but without >transparency/reciprocity, collecting sensitive >information on ordinary citizens _without evidence of >their misbehavior_ seems invasive to me. > You won't hear me argue that we don't need greater transparency. There's also the point DB makes in TS:
"Well financed criminals will almost certainly develop those artifices long seen in spy thrillers: an artificial fingertip covering, crafted by adroit machines to fool some of the print readers that are coming on to the market." (hardcover p240) Doug Hmmm. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
