In a message dated 7/12/2003 2:27:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Adjusted for era, Pedro's numbers at his peak are just > flat-out better. A modern's bias would be if the two > were roughly equal, and I was saying _that_ showed > that Pedro was better. But that is not, in fact, my > argument The key is how the "adjusted for era" is made. Here is where subjective judgement mascarades as objective fact. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
