> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John D. Giorgis > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:41 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Clinton's Perjury *Again* RE: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words > > At 04:34 PM 8/2/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote: > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On > >> Behalf Of John D. Giorgis > >> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:46 PM > >> To: Killer Bs Discussion > >> Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words > >> > >> At 09:25 PM 7/22/2003 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >Which of course is what > >> this all about. So many Democrats turned a blind > >> >> eye to Clinton's > >> perjury > >> > > >> >But this is where you are precisely wrong John. No democrat > >> defended > >> > Clinton this. Not one said he was right > >> > >> > >> Au contraire.... a great many noted that "any man would lie about > >> adultery." > >> > > > >Cite please. I'm unaware of any democratic or republican politico who > >said 'What he did was right, and lying about it was expected and > >acceptable.' Just because a late night talk show comedian like Bill > >Maher says it doesn't mean he is speaking for the American people. > > Please do not put words in my mouth. I never accused any Democrat of > saying those words, and as such it is wholly unreasonable for you to > expect > me to find them.
John, this is the second time in three weeks that you have accused me of something I did not do. You: "So many Democrats turned a blind eye to Clinton's perjury." Bob Z: "But this is where you are precisely wrong John. No democrat defended Clinton this. Not one said he was right" You: "Au contraire.... a great many noted that "any man would lie about adultery." Your last sentence states and can be translated as 'On the contrary, a great many noted and therefore defended Clinton and said he was right by saying 'any man would lie about adultery.' John, if that's not what you meant, then you'd better rephrase it better. But don't accuse me of putting words in your mouth. You said it, not me. > Bob Z. said that no Democrat defended Clinton on this. > > In my mind, Bob Z.'s claim is patently absurd. Many Democrats did argue > that any man would lie about adultery, and the only possible reason for > making such a claim was to attempt to mitigate the charges against > Clinton, > and as such, defend him. What democrats said that it was acceptable for Clinton to lie under oath? Cite please. It's not unreasonable for me to ask you to back up a public claim like this with evidence. Jon Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
