On 1 Nov 2003, at 9:06 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 1 Nov 2003 at 20:28, William T Goodall wrote:
So Andrew starts by giving a (mistaken) definition of religion. Then he implicitly uses a different definition of religion later in his rant. > > Hence it is a non sequitur.
And hence it is a non sequitur.
I meant it *precisely* how I said it.
Which part of my argument are you disagreeing with here?
You'd have to be utterly devoted to your own mnarrow view of life, bound by a ironclad doctine which allows no view outside your own little window. Oh wait...
It's only a non sequitur if you can't accept reality.
LOL.
-- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
"The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd; indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible."
- Bertrand Russell
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
