--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You talked about Gautam thinking in black and white
> terms.  Having debated
> with him over the years, I know that isn't true.  A
> number of conservatives
> do; he doesn't.
> Dan M.

I wanted to thank Dan for his kind words, congratulate
his excellent post, and continue with a thought.

I see the comment on "shades of gray" a lot.  It has
always struck me as profoundly ironic, and Dan's post
finally made me understand why I thought of it that
way.

The United States has done lots of bad things in its
history.  Also lots of good things.  In my opinion the
good far outweighs the bad.  In the case of Iraq, it
certainly launched a war of choice based on evidence
that, we now know, was incorrect.  This is, at best,
unfortunate.  That doesn't make the war a bad idea or
mean that the outcome is bad or will be , but it's
hardly optimal either.  It's still possible - even
likely - that the final outcome for the people of Iraq
will be highly positive - that is, they will end up
with a government vastly superior to the one that they
had (in Mark Steyn's perfect description, they will
probably be the "least badly-governed state in the
Arab world").  It's also possible - and also likely,
in my opinion, although less likely than the previous
outcome - that, in the long run, the war will be seen
to have been in the interests of the United States and
its allies.

The Saddam Hussein regime was all bad.  In a world of
shades of gray, it was just black.  It had no
redeeming features in any meaninful sense, with the
possible exception that it did maintain Iraq as one
state.  That's about it, though.  It was just all bad.
 For the sake of shades of grey people, I will say
that it is a shade of grey so dark as to be
indistinguishable from black with the naked eye.

The debate here isn't between people who see the world
in black and white (the US, good, Saddam, bad).  It's
between people who can distinguish between different
shades of grey and those who can't or won't.  Just
because the world is about shades of grey _doesn't
mean that we should be neutral between different
greys_.  That's an abdication of our most profound
moral responsibilities - and that, it seems to me, is
what people who talk about "it's not all black and
white" too often advocate.

=====
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to